why?
that term was around long before that song was.
get over yourself.
what do you think there is some code when people's minds think in sounds and type it out that way and don't put itinto a formal usage context?
there is no 'chanspeak'.
plus it's not spoken, but typed out.
so that would make it 'chan-typing'
just being very formal like you were, only with actualy concepts instead of pikiune rules of spelling.
see how annoying it is?
'chanspeak' . . . . get a grip there Grammar-monster.
Seems that Kevin Spacey's blackmailers (alledged) have backed down and decided not to risk purgery charges.
Expect all charges to be dropped. I always knew this would happen.
the boy let it happen, and he was of age. He tried to cash in on it which is typical of that class of vermin, his creepy parents, opportunists who pimp out a boy . . . to blackmail a sex-addicted movie star (with a daddy complex).
seriously I dislike Spacey, but he was set up and the charges were always bogus.
http://www.lowellsun.com/breakingnews/ci_32720664/from-nazis-hippies-end-road-volkswagen-beetle
does this end-of-the-line for the beetle have anything to do with the German bank that seems to be collapsing in slow motion?
isn't he the one who said it?
I remember him saying 'nothing good comes from Arkansa' during a debate and thought, well that "doesn't seem like a fair thing to say"
he was wrong about that.
don't start this.
captcha means that we don't have bots, run by shills, filling the bread with bad spam and constantly trying to slide or discredit the board.
breads are much much more comfy.
if you note I say all of that with the playful idea that if you get 'technical' that there can't be 'chanspeak' in that everyhing is typed and nothing is spoken.
but I do get your point and wished I had put an ironic 'lurk moar' at the end to disprove my own rant which I was debunking anyway by saying 'see how annoying that is'. In other words, the obvious nature of the mistake shouldn't have been so hard to see and my objection isn't to comprehension, or the preception of dialect, but aginst the presumption of grammatical superiority which I termed being a 'grammar monster'.
so I was rather well gripped. but thanks for the critique!
you got a good roll going on too.
by observation, no. Not in the breads in which Q used the trip.
But in breads in which Q didn't use the trip, there is no way to know.
even now, in breads where Q does use the trip, Q can post under a different ID and won't show up as Q.
frenz united!
not me. You got it inverted.
I am a Wittgenstien adherent about grammar.
USE is what you have to consider.
If you are writing laws and contracts you must use correct, and formal grammar. For articles in publications you use something not so formal.
while talking you use what you need to convey your ideas, if people are confused, they ask for clarity.
In public speaking you need to be formal to a point, but not overly formal, that makes you seem stiff.
and for shitposting?
if you dn't understand what I posted ask for clarity.
so I lurk as much as I need and you don't read through the posts.
glad I could clear that up for you.
yes, a prayer is not a shit post, and does need a good review.
fact: breads go much slower
and you are correct, we still have bots. But some of the more annoying ones were broken by the captcha.
It's easy to show that breads went much slower after captcha.
just go review those breads and see the average length of breads before and after captcha started.
my review at the time showed me that captcha worked.
of course technology marches on.