>>6966637

Q is Q

anon are anonymous.

Qanon is the 'group of all of the Q and anon' and they do not think with one mind, so they can't ever be considered 'right' in that sense.

there is no consensus.

my point: it makes sense to say 'Q was right' or 'some anon (and mention the post) was right', but to say 'Qanon' was right? that implies you don't understand the relationships and that these are real people. Qanon is the team of all of those people. They don't have a singular mind, and certainly don't agree on all things.

>>6966670

why do you confuse angel-face with cauldron guy?

PS: I won't make a mean meme about anjel but I will give yo ua good meme idea for him:

he promotes

"phake'n Gay. F-kay"

He's def some kind of operator and spy and think he really does work for the truth and the light.

>>6966744

It's alright if you disagree with me.

it's not alright if you have a hate campaign against a real person.

that is my point.

>>6966784

no matter who does it, if they stop, someone else can use the same method. That's part of the reason that using names doesn't work here.