Anonymous ID: 5f4201 March 17, 2018, 1:49 p.m. No.699886   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9924

>>699871

It is, and the original comment wasn't a bad one. I just believe it is incomplete, because you can still have systemic corruption, even in the homeland. Instead, if you pull the chip fab away from the monolithic monopolies, you suddenly create a production environment where they can't hide exploits in their designs because any competitor can suddenly be more transparent.

 

(Look into laser ablation chip fabrication if you're interested.)

Anonymous ID: 5f4201 March 17, 2018, 1:56 p.m. No.699941   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9966

>>699924

We need REAL, hard-core security that cannot be hacked. The only way to do that is to do your own audits and/or your own designs. It isn't all that difficult. If we just start educating our kids WELL, they could learn this stuff with no problem. (As a veteran software guy, I learned enough hardware to build my own fully secure computers from electronic components in within a year.)

Anonymous ID: 5f4201 March 17, 2018, 2:11 p.m. No.700106   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>700085

Look for the USAF report on the Multics attacks in the late 60's. The government was well aware of every type of attack vector (hardware and software) before UNIX was started by Bell Labs.

 

The whole digital security thing is pure cabal fuckery starting in the 80's. Intentionally insecure so they have exploits on everyone/everything.

 

It needs to stop. The only way I believe that happens is individual-level low volume IC production, which is not as difficult as it sounds.

Anonymous ID: 5f4201 March 17, 2018, 2:14 p.m. No.700134   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>700121

I'll bet if @Snowden was part of the Q group, the Q group might have some trouble finding him if the goal was that he shouldn't be found until the time was right. Something about it being difficult to get a man to learn something when his job depends on not learning itโ€ฆ

Anonymous ID: 5f4201 March 17, 2018, 2:24 p.m. No.700210   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0235

>>700185

electronicsfag here - most chips don't even require advanced fab capabilities. DIY fab is possibleโ€ฆthat's where the investment in the future should go. Plus, we can educate the population to do it so they actually understand WTF is going on in their devices. Then they'll come up with better solutions.