>>7004343

Okay BO I missed a big part of your post and what it implied. I though you were redoing the one war room section that was one post on the existing breads (standard intro, q posts, recent notables, research tools and special threads).

I prefer that format regardless if we get questionable notables or not.

I know this place must be a shit show to oversee but the Anons have been doing fine. Missed the Q post about it completely.

Like the great boob debate of 2018 this too shall pass. Hope we go back to old system.

>>7004514

Hi Q

PP worked on the CLOCK.

How many coincidences.

Thank you for the great show.

Screen cap of the Q post.

The muhh notables change is just moving them to a separate bread and making them nominatable by individual anons and not the sole discretion of the baker? Is that an accurate summary?

Guess it might be worth a try. My initial vote is not to change them. Shills will shill. Sometimes they get in the kitchen. There have been plenty of breads with crappy notables. They are only highlights of things the baker thought relevant. I can decide for myself what to focus on.