Anonymous ID: e7735d July 12, 2019, 6:40 a.m. No.7010604   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0962

>>7010572

>It allows the entire community to post their view on what's notable. Other anons can use their discernment as needed.

and how exactly is that not the case in any single thread? stubborn bakers refusing posts just means anons repost every thread.

the argument doesn't hold up.

 

and still no explanation why to fuck with the rest of the dough and take out resources.

notice that is the main point of the anon post Q confirmed

Anonymous ID: e7735d July 12, 2019, 6:47 a.m. No.7010701   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>7010648

>No, the proper thing to do is the BO & BVโ€™s check the bakers like 8Bit used to do. That way we donโ€™t have Fkn shill bakers or AFLB baking.

um, that can't work when the checkers are shills themselves.

BO does not work for or even with us.

 

it could have been salvaged but no, he dug his hole deeper. Notables fight is just the tip, resources in dough were attacked as well for no good reason.

Anonymous ID: e7735d July 12, 2019, 6:52 a.m. No.7010763   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>7010714

> those faggots removed notables.

not just that, they also tried to "trim the dough" of resources.

had to walk most of it back, but there was never a proper reason to do it in the first place, unless to fuck with us & resources

Anonymous ID: e7735d July 12, 2019, 7 a.m. No.7010891   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0971

>>7010801

>Agreed not so difficult to just open another browser window to see them.

but then following a regular thread + the notables discussion on another doubles the work,

and is completely unworkable for phonefagging.

 

all jpeg posts will not link properly, and long "notables only" threads will be clusterfucks separated from the general threads.

 

it just does not work, no defending it.

and is still a distraction from the even worse attack on the other dough posts taken out by BO for no good reason.