Anonymous ID: 00c03d March 17, 2018, 4:45 p.m. No.701480   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1797

>>701397

I can define every point on the arc with geometry but not all points on the arc as I have no way to do so without the circle definition. That is the quandary. Duality one or the other and near the twain shall meet. Fuck that - we need to find it!!!

Anonymous ID: 00c03d March 17, 2018, 4:59 p.m. No.701603   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>701570

You are basically correct when you move in in Euclidean it all is triangles and does not become and arc. The trick is the making the hypotenuse an arc - the formula changes each degree. there must me a formula for that.

Anonymous ID: 00c03d March 17, 2018, 5:05 p.m. No.701662   🗄️.is 🔗kun

You need the why again.

 

why relativity

 

why is we are not being told the physics they know. We have the info we actually know it.

 

Musk may have shown it is not theory anymore.

Anonymous ID: 00c03d March 17, 2018, 5:18 p.m. No.701747   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>701730

They defined it.

Then I pointed out the slope was the change in difference between the hypotenuse and the arc shown. Second iteration. And I can't figure it and hoped someone smarter here.

Anonymous ID: 00c03d March 17, 2018, 5:42 p.m. No.701965   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2024

>>701730

They defined it.

Then I pointed out the slope was the change in difference between the hypotenuse and the arc shown. Second iteration. And I can't figure it and hoped someone smarter here

.>>701911

All I want is the formula for taking a hypotenuse that cuts across a circle and how to use that line to define the arc *yes I will use the radius'. I know the formula for finding every point on the arc but want the formula for creating the arc from that intersecting hypotenuse.

Anonymous ID: 00c03d March 17, 2018, 5:49 p.m. No.702081   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>702024

I feel it is Q and Musk related but cannot prove until I can prove the math. It would be a shift in physics theories and that I feel they have this and not told us.

you may do as you feel is right for you.