Anonymous ID: 9d92a7 March 17, 2018, 4:41 p.m. No.701444   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1586

>>701369

 

I think the numbers based on his 'crumb' were adding up to the Circumference of Circle but cannot be done. BCZ Pi

 

Kind of interesting take drawing Circle from outside point through number iteration. He was proving you could exactly define pi from starting at some Edge of the circle Zero-point in theory, but in practice you cant.

 

Why did I post this or respond? It's interesting and I already contributed this:

 

>>700817

Anonymous ID: 9d92a7 March 17, 2018, 4:56 p.m. No.701570   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1573 >>1603 >>1634

>>701504

 

No, He's using the difference of numbers derived from pi/4 and then marking the diff, of arcs with continuous intersecting 45 degree lines. He found the difference , probably through some trig knowledge of degrees per circumf ratio.

 

Since the numbers are going up. I think he is proving that in theory, you could find a zero point number (Edge of the circle) and then iterating those numbers, Complete Pi from Zero, Zero being the start of the circle.

 

This literally means he is completing the last digit of Pi in theory by starting from zero @ edge of circle.

You can do any of these things in theory, but just like infinities, there are proofs in math that do not actually exist. The moment a pencil mark or physical object rep. circle is used marks a space of the circumference larger than the lowest number needed to complete Pi from zero.

 

Was this right ? Where is that guyโ€ฆ Answer me, or I want a refund.