Yes, because they regularly review the signatures and delete these fake ones. In fact they may be deleting all of your signatures if they caught you cheating.
The GA drop said [1] 1st after [19]
Can we agree that McCabe's firing recommendation from the Disciplinary Office (19 chars) was the [19] marker?
That would mean [3] 1st is next and that marker stands for….
But in any case, it is connected to HRC/BC having money in a foreign bank account. So it could be CGI which is Clinton Global Initiative.
Or, it could be something to do with Arkansas and old crimes (Isn't murder the only one still not past the statute of limitations? There were 2 boys murdered and then Vince Foster. So it could simply be 3 because of 3 murders which they have evidence for.
We know that any credible criminal charge for HRC or Bill is going to lead to a whole web of crime, more charges against them and charges against just about anybody who was anyone in the past 20 years. So taking the first step is a big deal.
We also know that Soros orgs promised to fill the streets if HRC is arrested. That explains the USMC activation because in a state of emergency they can be used in the USA (and are being used)
Why 3 booms? Maybe just because [3] is the marker but I can't accept that. Q always has multiple meanings that matter. It could be 3 people going down. Chelsea as well? Or it could be 3 counts of murder as I mentioned.
Or I might be completely wrong. What if that money in HRC/WC's bank account was finalled through a CIA budget account? Then [3] would be CIA and we all know what that is. Boom Boom Boom could be charges against 3 CIA people including Brennan.
There were some partial account numbers dropped quite a while ago and we never bottomed out what they were. There was an old CIA document that showed budget accounts as XXXX-XXXX but that could have changed to XXXXX-XXXX which was in the drop. Many of the CIA budget account numbers would be quite open and found on purchase orders, invoices to suppliers and declassified documents from FOIA.
I don't think we dug enough on those. Too many anons just assumed they were bank account numbers because they have no experience working in large organizations.