>>702000

>US (3).

?

<<<vid is Silent for a reason, anons.

>>702250

Agree, primarily b/c the charges would pre-empt them playing their sneaky legalese language games.

If they want to argue the Law, then let's get straight down to Brass Tacks, shall we?

How about a hint instead?

Find the title of vid.

…splainer better?

>>702364

You can read them already Setting The Stage.

e.g. "substance".

(curious if any legalfags have placed that word in the Code Book yet & see what spits out.)

>>702691

To SSaCH, Absolutely Nothing.

←-

>http:// www.tmz.com/2017/10/26/

clint-hill-secret-service-jfk-president-kennedy-assassination-oswald-marilyn-monroe/

>>702875

Sorry forgot vid for the lazyanons.