>>705365

BO, is it possible to implement an autoban for the idiots putting Q's name and tripcode in the name field? Might at least reduce the number of times boards get shat up via people having to explain why it's not Real Q.

Post >>705183

This is definitely Q?

I can discern bold/regular name & trip - but in this case, none show up. Does the post appear this way to everyone, or is it just me?

>>705468

Ha. NOW it shows up. Definitely Q.

Weird that trip&name didn't show up initially. Is this normal - is there a bit of delay?

>>705490

Fucking lawyers, right? kek

>>705494

Another Q post that didn't show his name & trip for me at first. There must be a delay, because I was pretty sure you couldn't edit posts..

>>705520

or he won't hear anything until a black bag goes over his head

>>705549

"again"?

I'm not aware of any time this board was literally controlled by said circus performers

>>705557

>>705554

Oh. Still, haven't the bozos always had access? I mean, all they need is an internet-enabled burner phone or VPN free trial and they can get back on the board

>>705614

less of the real variety too

Anyone think (((they))) could be putting together intel on the rough number of individual anons posting on this board via typing style, punctuation & grammar use etc?

Actually, you know what would be a better fix for the Fake Q problem? CM would have to do it rather than BO, but it's possible they could completely disallow a post if the name field contains Q's name and tripcode. (and ban for good measure) - but it's better than simply banning, as VPN hopping won't help against this.

>>705723

I realized it might be better for it to completely stop a post being posted if the name field contains these things, rather than just the ban. But yeah, it might need some discussion/thought before taking an action like this. Something needs to be done about the board-upshitting resulting from this simple shill tactic of fake-Q though.

>>705802

It's a surprise HRC hasn't started one, considering how many times she's played the victim card in the public eye after her loss. She thinks it's everyones fault but her own. She feels like she was "meant" to win and it was "her turn" hahaha. If anyone was to move somewhere and start a 'government-in-exile', it would be the "rightful" (ffs it makes me feel sick to even joke about that idea) POTUS.

>>705844

testing

>>705867

Might as well enjoy the music

>>705893

I think if someone enters that, it should give an error instead of posting that post. Bans can be circumvented, this can't be.

>>705888

Baruch is still around? Dunno, guess I thought those guys would have packed up and gone home after their operation at CBTS got shut down.

>>705932

It's a simple tactic that leads to a lot of board-shitting, unfortunately. We end up with his original post shitting up the board, plus:

• People replying, thinking he's Q

• People asking other anons if that's the real Q

• Multiple people posting how to tell a fake Q apart (although I'm not saying it's bad to advise people on this)

All that from just pretending to be Q.. I think the system needs to be made to not allow a post if the name field contains Q's name and tripcode.

Any consensus on SecState change?

I remember there was a bit of concern here when it happened.

Clowns "taking over" or simply the next phase of Trump's plan?

>>706019

>Lurk Moar.

Honestly, I've probably been at it at least as long as you. Now, want to be constructive?

I know the gist of it, but I'm not here 24/7, so it's not impossible that I've missed something.

>>706032

Oh, and I should add.. I never said it was WARRANTED concern. Just people freaking out instead of trusting the plan, so I wanted to know if that crap had died down now that they've had a chance to get their panties out of a bunch.

>>706044

No doubt they'll try to circumvent it by adding weird blank-space unicode chars or whatever along with the name & trip, so regex etc for the name&trip, block any post containing it in the name field

>>706081

That would be a start. Likely a good idea to prevent it server-side too though.

>>706083

great song, was kek