That's what happens when new bread isn't ready when current bread gets to 751.
I had a thought to label that kind of name in a post as a fake in my research database. I've done it before.
This is not a game. Q has at least once set the USSS upon a fake Q.
I've saved up to the last general. I'm working on re-parsing everything for the research database. Full update should be ready by tomorrow afternoon.
So…. What were we doing before the bread confusion? Other than greeting Q?
I don't think he's on the one I baked. When I realized this one was available, I suggested the other be deleted.
If he's around, BO can delete the one I baked. But the last several posts in that thread point to this one. So it should be obvious enough.
Different guy, I think. The post I responded to looked like it was educating Q. It's possible he isn't familiar with that, but I doubt it.
I did suggest some time ago that the trip at least be given a more obvious style. It wouldn't be difficult at all. Change the text color or give it a background color, and no one should be mistaken about whether a Q post is real or not. Quick fix in the CSS. In my own archives, I put something between the two fields.
Speaking of freedom of speech: Was a new IBOR petition created? It kind of looks like that.
Two lines is good. If they keep their current positions, solution needs to include color.
I'll just have to write a new parser.