>>7247491

>>7247246

Anons were talking about incarnated extraterrestrials

>>7246427 (off bread)

then almost an hour later Q posts a tweet from an account named ReIncarnatedET in the crumb you linked

what he tweeted was already in the notables

what he tweeted was without a hashtag, meaning Q has eyes on this account

Coincidence? Message?

>>7247491

keep it updated

>>7248895

>>7249402

That would be three mentions of (re)incarnated extraterrestrials so far, one cryptic (you) and two twitter handles.

Sure, it's not a confirmation, but you know how Q operates. Mathematically possible to be random?

>>7252761

Very nice man. We need to get more solid crumb-based bearings on the ET question. If Q&A arises you bet we won't go lower than 40k