End of defense of mechanics, start of defense of philosophy:
βββββββββββ-
Light is 'seen' through reflections onto specialized sensors, rods and cones, in the ocular optical apparatus.
How is darkness 'seen'? Is there an apparatus built into the human physiology that detects spiritual darkness? Is there any way for human physiology to detect actual darkness (i.e. lack of photons) except by reference with respect to light? If there was a 'dark' light, what would delineate 'dark' light from 'light' light?
To go all religious on you for a second: one of the first recorded acts of the Elohim was to separate two polarities (?) from a single substrate. What did they do? Divided light from darkness? The recorder, Moses, Abraham, or Enoch (depending on the tradition you're observing), at that time, couldn't understand what happened and satisfied himself to associate the lesser light with the night (ruled by the moon) and the greater light with the day (ruled by the sun). And that was where the delineation ended in religious texts? Another anon suggested there were two gods in ancient Israel, one that destroys and one that sustains. Maybe there is some 'there' there?
There's a big difference between looking at your problems and wallowing in them. I mean you could wade or swim, right?
Those of you throwing up digs on Enlil and Enki have no way of knowing whether the readers have already dug to bedrock on that or not. As far as you know, the next thing you see is something apparently off topic. Those of you fixated on tearing down Catholicism throw up your evidences but clearly must know that it's not like the rabble are going to storm the Vatican with any more success than the planned storming of Area 51. So what's your purpose? How do you know that anons aren't already aware from alternate sources? And even if anons really are aware of linkages between star clusters and believe the speculated linkages between religions across millennia are real, what do you expect the average anon to 'do' with those awareness and beliefs? Even if we stormed the Vatican, and figured out how to use the wormhole 'technology', what do you want us to do? Wait to die with just the 'right' knowledge in our heads?
Are you aware of how big the draco systems are? You think they are all evil? Are you aware of how dependent the Anunnaki are on the 'barely evolved pond scum' around them? You think they are all evil or perhaps might their dependency on us mitigate some of their anti-live tendencies? Are you able to tell the differences between negative interdimensional creatures and their positive counterparts? Can you detect the influences of the one or other?
Psychological theory tells us it is much worse to have a problem, not have any control of the situation, and know we have no control, than to have a problem, lack control, and believe we have a way forward. Q says mission forward, right?
Seems to me that blabbing about negative dimensional creatures without arming the readers, in the same breath, might be psychologically inadvisable, maybe?
Talking about the evils of religion without telling the whole truth about how religion does caretake spiritual truths during destruction events, diaspora, etc., seems less ethical.
Patriots can fight without focusing exclusively on the negative, can't they? Remember there are two definitions Q gave for two very different kinds of Patriots who fulfill pretty divergent functions.
When analyzing shills, or content you deem to be potentially shilly, ask yourself what definition of Patriot is the author likely to be affiliated with.
Speaking of unearthly militaryβ¦I wonder if Q ever speaks as a regular anon? Since this is a military operation, this means Q speaks for the military. If they ever spoke as normal civilians, I wonder what kind of stuff they talk about?
>>7123603
So this is an ongoing battle between disclosure Patriots who want a particular narrative about darkness and fear to 'own' the bread and other Patriots who just want information disclosed in is own time and in its own way in such a manner as to cause the least harm possible. Both can be true but there are few of the former who maintain synchronization because by its nature fear and darkness repel most people on earth now. The latter are deemed ineffectual and wimpy and even lazy by the former because the 'fight' of the second is more about enabling and facilitating digs than actual in-your-face aggressive counter- talk.
Anyway, you all be blessed. (Note: I just copied this image, I don't know if it is a true representation of a board threat or not; please ignore anything false. )