>>7079219 (lb)
>You don't revert back
>Revert already means to go back
Q is a biblefag so it's only natural for him to use this sort of redundancy since the Bible contains many of the same redundancies throughout the holy book.
One example would be the usage of "lift up" in "A song of Ascents/Degrees:
>I will lift up mine eyes unto the mountains
So take it up with the big man upstairs if you have any issues with the historical usage of such redundancies and its continued usage in modern times.
Besides, it's not our job to change what Q had originally posted, we merely note it as it is.
Expand your thinking, grammarfag.