Anonymous ID: df7ba4 March 18, 2018, 7:27 a.m. No.708430   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>8444 >>8503 >>8506 >>8682

To me, Q’s post talking about tripcodes on this board doesn’t make logical sense, unless he’s having trouble posting, which it appears he’s not.

For a week we’ve been talking about Cankles amd Huma’s trip to India, and why, if Q’s intel is correct which we believe it to be, could this reconcile.

Is Q letting us know that trips / travel is allowed if people are whitelisted to go.

Anonymous ID: df7ba4 March 18, 2018, 7:48 a.m. No.708638   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>8683

>>708572

Also, with Hillary, Obama and Huma, which law states that the military or any administration can stop a person from travelling if they haven’t yet had a fair trial? The cabal have to have a chance of defending themselves amd their crimes, otherwise the US would be no better than a banana republic and it would cause major civil unrest, possibly civil war.

Anonymous ID: df7ba4 March 18, 2018, 8 a.m. No.708756   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>708682

Whitelist = Allow travel under agreed conditions. They haven’t been legally charged for any crimes as yet. I would imagine the evidence of the crimes have been spelt out to them, they know they will be tried and they’ve agreed on the conditions of travel.

That they are travelling and still shit talking Trump and visiting countries to shore up support, is telling not only to us, but gives even more evidence against them. Trump is giving them even more rope to hang themselves, gathering as much evidence as possible to ensure there is no chance of them escaping under any technicalities or lack of evidence situations.