Anonymous ID: f1dcdf March 18, 2018, 8:40 a.m. No.709095   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9097 >>9643

Remember that Trump interviewed Mueller right before he was appointed as Special Prosecutor.

It may be a good time to revisit this discussion considering what has happened in the last 9 months.

 

https:// www.cnn.com/2017/06/13/politics/trump-robert-mueller-fbi-director-interview/index.html

 

Remember, Mueller was ineligible for the position, so what did they talk about?

Anonymous ID: f1dcdf March 18, 2018, 8:44 a.m. No.709127   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9272

>>709097

I have been here, nigger. That was five months ago. Most of us - you obviously excluded - have

learned some things since then. As the IG report is upcoming and Mueller is all over the news now,

it might be a good time to discuss this interview again and its PRESENT impact/implications.

I typed this very slowly, because I know you can't read fast (or well).

Anonymous ID: f1dcdf March 18, 2018, 9:11 a.m. No.709350   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9676

>>709272

I think the most notable thing is not what has happened, but what has not happened.

Mueller has indicted Flynn (using probably poisoned fruit), two from Trump's campaign for

crimes back 10 years or so ago, and 13 Russians. What else? Bupkiss.

 

So, what has he been investigating for the last 9 months? He's got nothing but Trump-haters on

his staff. Biased or shielded? We know that Mueller was not eligible for the position, so the

interview was a cover. In my opinion, the evidence seems to support Mueller is investigating

HRC, Hussein, Comey (maybe), and the DNC, etc. This may not be new, but as more evidence

comes in, nothing seems to point to Mueller actually investigating Trump's collusion.

Anonymous ID: f1dcdf March 18, 2018, 9:49 a.m. No.709676   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9703 >>9787

>>709643

>>709350

I followed up with the above. I think we should realize that Mueller has accomplished nothing so

far. If that's the case, then what has he been doing for the last 9 months, besides spending

federal dollars? The longer there is "no output" from his investigation, the more inclined I am

to believe he is investigating HRC, DNC, et al.

Anonymous ID: f1dcdf March 18, 2018, 9:56 a.m. No.709748   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>709514

The more certain an anon sounds in his conclusion, the more certain I am that he is a

clown. See the other response to your ( you ) message…