>>709688 Last Bread

Just one area?

Has she been charged with anything that we are aware of?

Has she been prosecuted for anything that we are aware of?

Has she been convicted of anything that we are aware of?

Would it be possible for her to be charged, prosecuted, or convicted of anything without public knowledge?

Does she maintain all of her rights as an American citizen until prosecution? If her travel was limited, do you think that her attorneys would wail to high heavens in the press to generate negative publicity for Trump?

Freaking simpleton! Lurk moar!

>>709778 Last Bread

Just one area?

Has she been charged with anything that we are aware of?

Has she been prosecuted for anything that we are aware of?

Has she been convicted of anything that we are aware of?

Would it be possible for her to be charged, prosecuted, or convicted of anything without public knowledge?

Does she maintain all of her rights as an American citizen until prosecution? If her travel was limited, do you think that her attorneys would wail to high heavens in the press to generate negative publicity for Trump?

Freaking simpleton! Lurk moar!

>>709932

You are correct I did pull wrong post. Your last three responses make no sense though as her legal team would have went to the press within the first hour to gin up support and pressure.

>>709985

source?

>>709988

There are secret courts and tribunals for process and laws, not for individuals. Please give one historic example if I am wrong.

>>710010

Based on? I have never seen the term whitelist used in regards to travel before. Do not fly? Sure. Blacklisted from certain countries? Certainly.

>>710020

The charges are not levied until the indictment is opened though. In other words, if her name appeared on a sealed indictment and you ran a background check, it would not reflect she had been charged with anything at that moment.

No prosecution has been made. Once again, example of charged, prosecuted, or conviction in secret court please.