Epstein: Release of papers would cause FRENZY, insists former girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell

The British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell is trying to block the release of documents about her relationship with the millionaire financier Jeffrey Epstein, who has been accused of sex abuse and trafficking young girls.

Ms Maxwell, 57, the youngest daughter of the late newspaper publisher Robert Maxwell, claims that the release of 2,000 pages of correspondence as part of a civil case would lead to a “FURIOUS FEEDING FRENZY” that could prejudice correct legal processes.

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/epstein-release-of-papers-would-cause-frenzy-insists-former-girlfriend-ghislaine-maxwell-r3lxnlk93

>>7103246

SELF-NOTABLED*

*we are getting trash spammed and this needs to be in the notables.

>>7103436

>>7103436

>Absolutely not notable until then.

That’s a ridiculous statement. If anons think it’s notable, it’s notable.

She’s a BRITISH SOCIALITE, and the article was JUST PRESSED in the UK. So that’s my argument, the fact you aren’t so adamant means I’m over the fucking money. Calm down nobody knows anybody. Like the hive mind take over.

>>7103494

Keks.

Baker you do you, but this ^^ response is out of this world.

Justification: an anon with a sub with see in the notables and give us the rest of the article.

Or, we can just ignore it because it la paywall’t.

Choice is yours.

>>7103569

>>7103618

Thanks anon

>>7103494

Now you can go find someone else to bark at. Cunt mouth.

>>7103647

You are a PROBLEM.

Anons - why would someone be SO adamant about something like notables? Look at the effort. Look at the anger. It’s bizarre.

Keep an eye out for notable nazis. This might be a new thing. Very divisive.

>>7103671

No. The way you talk to other anons is outrageous.

It’s just plain absurd to be THAT worked up about electrons.

It’s a new article, we got the sauce. You’ve been exposed, so be gone now. Buh byes.