Anonymous ID: da9678 March 18, 2018, 1:41 p.m. No.712085   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>712007

 

How does intel work? How does the NSA, CIA, whatever, figure things out?

 

Multiple corroborating sources.

 

We have one source: Q. We were given "US (3)" and nothing more. We can find a thousand things it could be. But there is no corroborating source. Every option remains possible. None is confirmed or denied. We have one option: wait for news to break. And even then we're in the same boat because the real "meaning" was whatever Q decided it was at the time it was posted. How to know? Be Q.

 

What would you have us do differently?

Anonymous ID: da9678 March 18, 2018, 1:45 p.m. No.712122   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>712086

 

1) there are legalities surrounding revealing classified info that must be danced around.

 

2) in the process of digging, we run across other info that WILL turn out to be useful down the road.

 

3) the entire outcome is assimilated by the brain very differently when we have to dig for an answer rather than simply being told what it is.

 

"This board was chosen for a reason." I'm reasonably sure that if all they wanted to do was retain a captive audience while final answers were recited, any other platform from Facebook to Twatter to Reddit would have done just fine.

 

Consider it a compliment: we aren't given this info by people who are sure we'll never figure it out.

Anonymous ID: da9678 March 18, 2018, 1:49 p.m. No.712179   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>712108

 

Hmmmm … processing this … this would mean that Rusty the Cat truly is the king of all cats.

 

The ramifications of this alone are staggering.