why such a strong shill attack of degenerates so early on a Sunday?
Is something big happening?
you can't 'go back' where you didn't actually go in the first place.
how intelligent of you.
did yo ever check those radiation charts and the sunspot activtiy, solar flare activity coorelated to when the astronaughts were supposedly out side where the mag field won't protect them?
no, I didn't think so.
derision and guttaral snorting can't errase the facts about the high level cuckoldry and fraud of NASA from the start.
it was designed to syphon money to the most favored minority.
the shill must put a label on the anon who dares to chime in.
In this case the shill calls the anon a 'flat earther' and does not do a dig on the radiation charts or the Astronaut sojourn timelines and how they coorespond.
the skepticism, healthy and with years and years of reflection (from someone who worked in a place where there was access to certain data not available on the outside) . . . all that the shill can do is to conflate and deflect.
this kind of piece is about a 'fictional demographic' and it's a 'type' of person who the author observes from behavior, but the author isn't really clear on the idea that it's behavior, and not the individuals, that are the problem. He creates a word called 'Emotionals'. In fact emotion is part of being human. Thus everyone is described within the authors piece, not just 'suburban housewives and . . . who else?'
anyway good in that sense, but not as awesome in that it doesn't recognized that a 'type' is always 'behavior' a type of behaivor, and NOT a person. There is no 'group' or 'person' who is exactly what the author describes.
it's a kind of 'demography mongering' that is bass in that it attempts to label and smeer as irrational and hyper emotional whole classes of people and based upon thin evidence.
it seems truthful in some of it's threds of naration, but in fact the idea of a person who is all that the author describes is far fetched.
it's like the generational labels, only useful for certain behavioral similarities but nothing real about the individual.