Anonymous ID: ec9674 July 21, 2019, 8:38 a.m. No.7120653   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>7120442

copy pasta from ancient bread iremembered but had to look up, >>5674033 (ab)

 

(old bread >>2317467 seems related also)

 

>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ectogenesis

 

>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J.B.S._Haldane

 

>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_uterus

 

>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liquid_breathing

 

>https://patents.google.com/patent/US2723660A/en?oq=US2723660

 

>https://patents.google.com/patent/US20020153010A1/en?q=Total&q=Liquid&q=Ventilation&oq=Total+Liquid+Ventilation

 

>https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/20/77/25/758a6439d78dd9/US20020153010A1.pdf

 

>https://patents.google.com/patent/US20050027316A1/en?oq=US20050027316A1 ("Resurrection burial tomb " - deliciously schizophrenic patent application the likes of wish I have never seen)

 

>https://www.quora.com/Can-humans-breathe-in-water-as-shown-in-the-movie-The-Abyss-There-are-scenes-in-which-a-mouse-is-dropped-in-oxygenated-or-some-cool-form-of-water-and-it-adapts-to-breathe-Is-such-breathing-via-some-specialized-water-possible-Why-or-why-not

 

>From Vice, Huffpo, Slate:

 

>https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/8qx8kk/artificial-wombs-are-coming-and-the-controversys-already-here

 

>https://www.huffingtonpost.com/soraya-chemaly/ectogenesis-feminism_b_4385417.html

 

>https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2014/10/ectogenesis-the-end-of-pregnancy-and-the-inevitable-rise-of-the-artificial-womb.html

 

>https://geneticliteracyproject.org/2016/04/06/artificial-uterus-close-reality/

 

>Movies:

 

>Universal Soldier

 

>Clone Wars

 

>The Matrix (obviously)

 

>Jurrassic Park (latest JP had a little girl who was a clone of the scientist's daughter, "standing on the shoulders of giants", "just because you could, didn't stop to think if you should…")

 

>What does this imply?

 

>>super soldiers

 

>>human/organ farms (for a variety of needs)

 

>>?

 

>To put it another way, what tech could we use right now to grow humans on an industrial scale?

 

>Today a POTUS tweet struck me as maybe related to this:

 

>>"Always seeking to go one unnecessary step further, when often old and simpler is far better…"

 

>is he really talking about avionics?