My apologies to anons for whom this was obvious already, but I just had a "light bulb" moment about Q "proofs". I have (more than once) looked at circumstances combined with my interpretations of Q drops and concluded I "knew" when a specific action against "bad actors" was going to happen. I've been also been disappointed "more than once"!
It should have been completely obvious to me that a high level US military insider would NEVER publicly telegraph when specific events would occur, especially action taken against traitorous enemies. That in itself would likely be considered to be "leaking" classified information or treason.
However, Q "proofs" do something different. They provide evidence that whoever Q and Q+ are, they are serving at the pleasure of the President and are "good guys" (whether male or female).
If it is true that the President arrived in Bedminster and got off the plane at exactly 4:49pm, I'd look at that as a possible Q "proof". When many of these "coincidences" occur we realize as Q has stated that it becomes "mathematically impossible" not to conclude or at least hypothesize that a high level "good guy" inside the President's leadership group is communicating with us here.
I want to apologize for misunderstanding the apparent intent of the "drops" and the "proofs" and for contributing toward my own dismay and discouraging others. If any more drops contain things like watch faces and such I plan on looking for "coincidences" other than arrests because when it all "goes down" we aren't going to be told here. Shouldn't that be obvious? "Disinformation is necessary." If the C_A and other intelligence agencies are messing with this board and monitoring it, "leaking" planned, and classified operational plans would not only be treasonous, it would be massively stupid.
Again, apologies to anons for being so ignorant and naive. I hope you all will forgive me.