tyb
POTUS agrees to prompt responses to license requests for Huawei sales
President Donald Trump agreed at a meeting with the heads of top technology companies like Google on Monday to make “timely” decisions on requests by U.S. companies to sell to blacklisted Huawei Technologies Co Ltd, the White House said.
But even as the CEOs of the companies “requested timely licensing decisions from the Department of Commerce,” the White House said in a statement that the executives expressed “strong support” for national security restrictions on U.S. telecom equipment purchases and sales to Huawei.
good luck getting prompt response from walking(sleeping) skeleton Wilbur Ross.
The meeting, previously reported by Reuters, was with the CEOs of Cisco, Intel Corp, Broadcom Inc, Qualcomm, Micron Technology Inc and Western Digital and Alphabet Inc’s.
The meeting comes at a time of lingering uncertainty over the future of U.S. companies’ ties to Huawei, the world’s largest telecommunications equipment maker. It was placed on a U.S. blacklist in May, with the government citing national security concerns.
U.S. companies were banned from selling most U.S. parts and components to Huawei without special licenses. But Trump said last month that sales could resume as he sought to restart trade talks with Beijing.
Clarity on what the new policy toward Huawei will be has been slow to emerge.
On Monday, executives expressed displeasure at Commerce Department Secretary Wilbur Ross, who also attended the meeting, for not providing clear guidelines on policy toward sales to the Chinese company, according to a person briefed on the meeting. White House economic adviser Larry Kudlow and Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin were also at the meeting, the person said.
Ross has said licenses would be issued where there is no threat to national security. Reuters reported last week that the United States could approve licenses for companies to restart new sales in a matter of weeks.
However, the Washington Post reported on Monday that Huawei secretly helped North Korea build and maintain its commercial wireless network.
That may bolster China hawks in the U.S. government who see Huawei as a real national security risk, over those who seek a more lenient policy to appease Beijing amid ongoing trade talks between the world’s two biggest economies.
he United States accuses Huawei of violating Iran sanctions and stealing American intellectual property, accusations Huawei denies. Washington has also lobbied allied governments to keep Huawei out of their 5G networks, arguing that the company’s equipment could be used to spy for the Chinese government.
The White House said unfair international trade practices and 5G technology was also discussed at the event on Monday.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-huawei-tech-usa/trump-agrees-to-prompt-responses-to-license-requests-for-huawei-sales-idUSKCN1UH1Y4
o7
Tesla Whistle-blower Karl Hansen Files New Lawsuit Against Elon Musk
Tesla whistle-blower Karl Hansen doesn't seem to be deterred by the intimidation tactics that the company has used against whistleblowers in the past. He's also dead set on trying to help other whistleblowers come forward, according to The Drive.
He filed a lawsuit on July 19 in Nevada against Elon Musk for violations of the Sarbanes-Oxley act, intentional interference with business relations and breach of contract.
Hansen said:
“It’s taken a long time to get to this point, and I remain steadfast regardless of any monetary outcome. The only thing we are guaranteed to take to our graves is our name. I’ve spent a career of integrity, and won’t stand idly by when someone like Elon Musk runs roughshod over others because he happens to be a billionaire.”
He continued:
“Even though this has been and continues to be one of the most wrenching experiences of my life, it’s important for people to do the right thing, even if it means doing it alone. If you stay in the arena long enough, even by yourself, people will notice that, and the right people are going to notice your courage, and will support you.”
In his lawsuit, he says that the company interfered with his ability to find work. It's a similar claim that some former Buffalo factory workers made, alleging Tesla “intentionally interfered with efforts to seek employment with other employers in retaliation for outspoken union support.”
The $TSLA + SolarCity + Elon Musk litigation counter is now at 620. Excel TSV data: https://t.co/dD0EifDBOE pic.twitter.com/e26oXD0tYX
— PlainSite (@PlainSite) June 13, 2019
According to the report, Hansen also alleges:
Musk and Tesla’s management actively concealed and participated in misconduct including spying on employees
Thefts ranging between $37 and $150 million dollars, along with links to a Mexican drug cartel
A Tesla employee was terminated after reporting the theft of $13,000 of copper wire to law enforcement, foreshadowing Hansen’s own termination from the company shortly after briefing management about his findings into criminal activities taking place
With regard to the cartel claims, it's also worth noting that "Pablo Escobar’s brother recently demanded $100 million in cash or Tesla shares from Musk for purportedly stealing his flamethrower idea". Nothing to see here…
Hansen's own termination is reminiscent of a former Tesla Director of Environment, Health, Safety and Sustainability who claimed they were fired after reporting safety violations. An assembly line worker was also reportedly fired after reporting anti-gay harassment.
And, of course, whistleblower retaliation was the main theme of the Martin Tripp case:
…after Tesla identified him as the source for a Business Insider article, Tesla’s Security team gave police a tip that they’d received an anonymous call that Tripp was planning a mass shooting at the Nevada factory where he had worked. That evening, when police confronted the tearful, unarmed Tripp he expressed his terror of Musk; they concluded Tripp posed no threat, meaning he had been the victim of a ‘swatting’.
Tesla provided a comment for the article, which included the following paragraphs:
Tesla takes misconduct like Mr. Hansen’s very seriously and the company has every right to expect its employees and contractors to abide by its policies, and to be fully honest and cooperative when dealing with an internal investigation. As a result of the discovery of Mr. Hansen’s misconduct and misappropriation of confidential information, Tesla informed Mr. Hansen’s third-party employer and asked the firm to no longer assign Mr. Hansen to the Gigafactory. However, Mr. Hansen’s termination from the third-party contractor is a matter between his employer and Mr. Hansen, and does not involve Tesla.
Elon was not personally involved in the decision to request that Hansen be reassigned from the Gigafactory, and doesn’t remember having ever met Hansen and certainly wouldn’t be able to identify him out of more than 40,000 employees at Tesla.”
Certainly, he wouldn't, right? We'd bet Mr. Hansen may disagree with this take…
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-07-22/undeterred-intimidation-tesla-whistleblower-karl-hansen-files-new-lawsuit-against
that's it?