>>7144363

iconclasm is the point of what you do?

that results in a lot of confusion.

they like you wasting your time on their images and 'art'.

they want you to go on a rampage of destruction.

They want you focused on the images and 'art' and 'feeling' it.

what you are doing is a cabal effort to get people to dwell on their symbols.

you are promoting their symbols while doing it!

they have you on their hook.

you are their monkey, dancing for them.

'SYMBOLISM means a lot'

you sound like you're either not smart, don't really speak English, or are a shill.

you being a shill is what I'm thinking.

the attention to the 'symbol' is the thing that the cabal wants. you attend to it in your 'art' or 'meme' and you promote it, and maybe even make it look sympathetic.

here is what you are saying:

Words mean a lot. Let's crumble all the words.

isn't that rather stupid?

>>7144527

if you take the words and put them in a font that is 'crumpled rubble' letters, the letters will still be there, and the words will mean the same thing.

the rampage of iconoclasm feeds the demons of the cabal with the emotional energy of the destroyers.

they like idiots like the other poster.

you, too, are a shill in support of the other on trying to incite iconclasm.

>>7144532

iconclasm is a poisonous idea that rejects the idea of 'symbols' and plays right into the cabals plan.

you focus on their meanings and use their bad ideas as the basis of your behavior.

failing to do new things you get absorbed with a highly potent negative energy that feeds the cabal demons.

>>7144547

saw this yesterday here.

>>7144569

the design for fabric originates at the loom.

the concept for that?

maybe they ran out of thred, so they said 'give me the white thread now.' then they said 'oh, here is some more blue thred'.

and then 'wow a pattern. We can sell that'.

then they hung their beautiful cloth in the market. A fat 'teacher' came by and declared it as their own.

"We own this now." maybe he thought (probably not).

and they used it to dress up in and act all 'holier than though'.

and it wasn't red so they could see if they got splattered blood on it during their pigeon sacrifices.

>>7144621

the anon who posted :

>7144363

"SYMBOLISM means a lot to the [cabal]."

is being a task master and asking people to waste their time making graphics based upon the poison symbol of the cabal.

the cabal loves iconclasm because it lets them control people.

People can be induced into rampages of destruction in this way.

'Symbolism', itself, isn't a problem. People who use symbols aren't a problem. Even most of the symbols used by cabal are benign in a different context.

words mean a lot to anyone.

symbolism has meaning. how could symbolism not 'mean a lot' ? the anon in that post basically admits, through the stupidity of that statement, that he doesn't understand.

Yes we learn their symbolism, of course.

but at no time to Q say 'and spend your time making crap art using their symbols, but make it disrespectful'.

I studied iconclastic movements through History.

we get things like Pol Pot's killing fields from that kind of push.

the anons pushing for iconclasm are shills.

and one of them is tryign to use Q as a prop as if Q said to do this.

Q wants us to understand, not be iconclastic destroyers.

>>7144666

they never want people to be free of the sex-urge.

its a powerful force of controlling people.

they know that it triggers even strong people to go that route for a time.

>>7144586

cool, true. they focus too much time putting negative energy 'out there' into the world though their crap messaging using symbols.

So they are trying to use Symbolism.

they use it, they tell their story. They admit their own evil. It's like they 'speak' of their crimes and confess with it.

how else would they? Oh, they could use words.

and they could use symbols.

the words and the symbols, and the idea of langauge or of symbolism isn't, itself, 'bad' or 'evil'. you can use those same words and symbols to 'say' something else.

In fact every post here does just that kind of thing.

the iconclastic mind control types take it one step further and say 'all words are bad' or 'all symbols are bad' or 'symbolism' is bad.

that would be a value judgment and a ripe fallacy.

(over ripe, stinking idea, a bad idea)

OF course we should learn and understand wht they mean and say with their symbols.

To fetishize it into laughingly bad meme efforts? and claim it's 'powerful', makes the same mistakes that they do. You use Symbolism like that and that could be your down fall too.

It's not the symbols or the words, or the idea of 'symbolism' or 'langauge', it what they do with it. They use it in a way that is promoting of harm. They use it and basically admit to abomination.

they 'confess' their crimes.

and that is their down fall.

their crap art, and all that 'symbolism' speaks a 'confession' for crimes that the cabal commits.

>>7144659

the only way to see a painting is with light, correct?

a scultpure could be felt with the hands.

I suppose a painting could also have 'texture'.

but a light: that means 'understanding it'

you mean 'to bring the idea of into comprehension.' that is a great idea.

so they go one sign, it's a 'this'. anohter it's a 'that'. you see, before 'letters' we used to, as people, use 'hyroglyphs'.

so any way, suppose there was so hateful phrase of the kind like this, I write in a meta, that way you can't confuse what I say,

'all of some_well_known_group are some_horrible quality'

and it's in a brick font. You found a font and it's letters that look like parts of brick walls.. So it's an A and it looks like a brick building in the shape of an 'A'. you get the idea.

so yo type out your phrase, what some would call a hateful phrase, and then you render it in 'brick building'

But not only that your render engine allows you to render your poison message in a 3D building font in a virtual world!

and then you can go into that world and you can play as a character and TNT mod set to true (find that setting in the ini file) and you can dynomite, in a virtual way, that messaging.

but isn't that rather elaborate? All that time wasted imagining that you are trashing an idea, that some idiot threw away when he/she said it? you spent your time blasting building.

and even after all that, you might still be able to read what the message said. So the message, which is the point of the 'use' of the letters, and the words, and the symbols, still makes it to the minds of those who see this kind of display of iconography.

the idea that you 'destroy' the idea of it through rediculous icon-destruction imagry is a fallacy that would waste the time of anon.

the destroyed building font buildings would still give out the poison message.

>>7144807

we need to use them to understand, and hear, what the cabal says.

if the messaging is poisonous, like some of the symbols seem to try to be, repeating that message, even in a 'crumble font' or 'destroyed building motif' still gives out the message.

second: iconoclastic orgies of destroying crap art are very common going back in time. People enjoy blowing up bad things.

if you do is safely, and with approval, it's called 'renewal (urban renewal at the muesuem of bad crap art).

the orgy of iconoclams can bleed into plan lawless and senseless destruction of important resources. For example the library at Alexandria was destroyed by people in that mode.

and yes, to have their symbols burst and shatter might unnerve those cretins.

but it might also unnerve others too, who don't deserve it.

as well: the time spent doing that kind of effort might be better spent doing something else.

>>7144858

if we go with the 'It is just a movie' line of discussion, I wouldn't second guess anything. Whatever you say about it isn't going to change how the movie progresses, what the outcome will be.

better to not assume anything.

and that gets to the 'expectation of a habbening' that often gets promoted.

Usually nothing notibile happens.

>>7144883

I think it's important to do a detailed and through study of 'their' use of symbolism.

They do use 'symbols' symbolism uses symbols, of course.

the symbolism means some 'idea'.

that idea is the thing that Q wants us to see from what we get.

yes, of course, learn what it means.

my point: the ideation of 'crumbling' symbols is just a cheap and amost masbatory thing to do, and animating it is akin to a kind of mental masterbation.

so go ahead, learn the symbols, and if you feel tha tyou 'need' to make some giant mural of 'their' symbols crumbling, all that paint, standing on that ladder.Drawing a cabal message with your cabal tools, and make it all nice and pretty and then do the 'crumble and decyed' effect. go do it if you must.

but don't burn down libraries.

and don't think that 'symbols' and 'words' are bad.

or The Sun: they use that symbol all the time.

is the sun bad?

a person who uses a pointing idiot as a meme and then talks about Liars isn't someone that I take seriously.