The top replies to KAG …
Hats off, nice job, adrenaline is awesome. Have a beer!
Not the first time an imperfect Q insinuated or encouraged or suggested a false conclusion. use your own head, don't try to make Q perfect, that's Q's baggage, not yours.
German (NAZI) dogs too. Bark Reich.
CIA Isikoff does not mention Ellen Ratner asserting as fact that the DNC e-mail was an inside job, not some foreign government (Russia, Russia, Russia)
https://www.c-span.org/video/?462772-1/fbi-director-wray-testifies-senate-judiciary-committee
10 AM Eastern Daylight
The press is touting this hearing as a preview of the Mueller hearings. Makes no sense to me, Wray is before a completely different set of people, and the FBI is more screwed up and corrupt than just being a central player in the ongoing Trump frameup.
Wray is a snake. Not as experienced as Mueller and Comey, but cut from the same cloth.
Guatemala, which has been forming Caravans and sending large numbers of people, some with criminal records, to the United States, has decided to break the deal they had with us on signing a necessary Safe Third Agreement. We were ready to go. Now we are looking at the “BAN,”….
….Tariffs, Remittance Fees, or all of the above. Guatemala has not been good. Big U.S. taxpayer dollars going to them was cut off by me 9 months ago.
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1153641906699681795
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1153641907781873664
Know this is posted above, just adding a image, plaintext, sauce all-in-one edition
Dream on. The "bond" between people at this level has more strength than Omerta.
How arrogant of the DOJ to reply to Mueller's Jul 10 request for guidance, and to say, albeit with particularity, follow DOJ regulations.
"I write in response to your July 10, 2019 letter concerning the testimonial subpoenas you received from the House Judiciary Committee (HJ C) and House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI). Your letter requests that the Department provide you with guidance
concerning privilege or other legal bars applicable to potential testimony in connection with those subpoenas."
The general outcome won't be affected by the contents of the hearings. The press will cherry pick and tell the public that Mueller finds the obstruction case to be an open issue for Congress to investigate. That was the conclusion in the report.
The fact that the legal theory to find obstruction sucks balls will not be mentioned, nor will any of the appointment or prosecutorial improprieties be given more than a passing mention, if any.
Irrational people do irrational things. Reason is ineffective, rules are twisted, same shit, different day.