I've been away from the board for a few days and just beginning to get caught up.
That said, kindly forgive this if it's already been pointed out:
On the Ted Cruz Twitter thread which Q posted, a person posting as "WeAreBetterThanThis" and claiming to be Miller's uncle posted several times, each one being standard JIDF propaganda, sourcing his "facts" from Jewish ADL reports and similarly biased sources.
One of his tweets purportedly quotes an article from dailymail.co.uk dated April of 2018. There's a mathematics non-sequitur here: The person being quoted as being reminded of 1930 Berlin is also said to be 79 years old. IF the man's age is accurate, he was born nine years AFTER 1930. He could not possibly remember what it was like, as he would not have been old enough to remember events until he was at least two or three years old (for most people, it's closer to five years old). That would mean he could remember what Berlin was like in 1941, at the earliest. I'm not saying Berlin 1941 was a picnic, I'm just saying that there is a mathematical conundrum in this article and it's therefore an example of bad reporting/propaganda.