Anonymous ID: af16f1 July 24, 2019, 11:59 a.m. No.7166782   🗄️.is đź”—kun

N - were you aware

that Prince was surveilled

 

M - nuhnuhnuhnuh

 

N - wouldn't it be a scandal for the leak of the national security advisor…

 

M- I can't agree with that hypothesis…

 

N - vol 1 pg33 Constanine Klmimnik - ties to foreign intel

US gov officials and our own state dept.

 

M - can't get into that

 

N - if Klimnik is being used, russian agent, does he have ties to our state dept., it appears he does…

 

M - I'm loathe to get into this territory

 

N - Dowd's phone call, exculpatory evidence….

 

M - NAGA agree wdat

 

N - republic of Georgie, misidentified as russian - stopped flow of tapes, did not know what tapes showed…

left out for a reason?

 

M - nonono, not familiar with that episide we did our best to include…

Anonymous ID: af16f1 July 24, 2019, 12:06 p.m. No.7166923   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>7166844

This is like the gorillionth time we've heard IT'S OVAH!

Not being dissentful here, but, some on!

Fuck the Dimms, fuck Schiif, Fuck Feinstein, Fuck Nadler, Fuck Schumer, Fuck Pelosi, Fuck the Jiohad Squad

FUCKFUCKFUCK

 

okay I feel better

Anonymous ID: af16f1 July 24, 2019, 12:10 p.m. No.7166980   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>6993

M - We understood we could subpoena the president

 

Maloney

Pg 13 vol. 2 substantial body of evidence

you used terms like significant evidence of intent to obstruct

 

M - there's a balance - how much time are you willing to spend litigating the president

 

Q - you thought that there was sufficient evidence of the president's intent to obstruct - didn't do interview bcuz of that, right?

 

M - no, too long a time to pursue