>>718082

Sauce?

>>718101

Any way to verify that?

I mean empirical evidence

Like a selfie of you and Jesus?

or a hand written letter from God?

>>718113

How very Christian of you.

Never attacked you, as you did me.

Just asked you to use a logical thought process.

Oh well.

How are you going to help us dig facts around here, again?

>>718143

According to Moby Dick (sorry, I mean the Bible, but I get my works of fiction confused), he would go to hell. You are supposed to love him and steer him away from it. I think you have more reading to do.

A word of caution, though, reading that book is precisely what led me to stop believing in it

>>718166

My intention is to encourage logical thought.

Belief in things, for which you have no sauce, should be discouraged in this forum.

Otherwise, Muh Elvis is alive, no?

>>718189

Or….nut jobs, who live to bring about he evil described in the same work of fiction (and, who have trillions of dollars at their disposal) will work hard to bring such things about.

>>718212

It could be WAAAYYYY more easily argued, that people with weak minds, would choose the path of devotion and payment to non existent entities.

>>718247

great…thanks for the condescending speech and the side hug. Still hoping that you can begin to ask real questions.

Like why are ALL of the stories in the old testament stolen from older writings in other cultures and changed?

>>718276

Your question makes this conversation seem altogether pointless.

I would mention that there is such a thing as free will. Which works great for you, when you choose God, but not so much, when I point out that everything is God's will.

I won't bother to ask you to choose one, since your choice will alternate, based on which point you are trying to defend.

Consistency is not the strong suit of the religious.

>>718331

So, then…God is not in control of everything and all-powerful?

>>718363

Exactly, which proof did you present?

The prediction that some psycho Satan Worshipers might or might not damage a city?

>>718389

Your statement does not equate to the event happening. Even if the event did happen, it would be far more likely that diabolical sickos would do such a thing.

At least, we could get photos of that, huh?

>>718418

Oh…probably no diabolical Satan worshiping psychos with access to a nuke, huh?

>>718458

Here is a Dodd interview on the topic.

MUST WATCH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

https://

www.youtube.com/watch?v=YUYCBfmIcHM&t=2530s

>>718434

Well, it seems that God explains and controls everything, so why look both ways before you cross the street.

This is not a confess and avoid tactic. Your point is horse shit. God's control must be proven before you can assert that he controls BOTH sides.

Religious people tend to build structures before foundations. Almost always, their arguments cannot be supported without moving past key concepts…such as empirical evidence.

>>718680

That is why you believe in Jesus. You have made no point, whatsoever.

That is, if a point is a fact. You have not stated a single fact, except what the Bible says. That only proves that the Bible says it. Not that what the Bible says is true.

>>718731

He already has…with critical thought.

Sick of it keeping me up, though.

Want it?

>>718754

At least we have the search for these truths (the storm) in common. That and humanity. Wish you well, Anon.