Anonymous ID: 074c75 March 19, 2018, 12:19 a.m. No.718852   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8881 >>8902 >>8908 >>9913 >>9985

Help needed to dig deeper

 

Elizabeth the Queen Mother had an elder brother named Bowes-Lyon. He sired two retarded daughters, cousins to QE II who spent their lives in an institution hidden away

 

I wondered what Google would say about Dorothea Bowes-Lyon and learned that this name was used in this branch of the royals too, as well as the German Saxe-Coburg-Gotha branch.

 

I cannot find the name Dorothea in use in Hitler's ancestry or Herlind Kasner's or Horst Kasner's. I can't find Dorothea in the Rothschilds.

 

There are only two possibilities I can see at this point.

 

1) Hans-Otto Wolber the bishop in Hamburg who was the spiritual father of Horst Kasner, suggested a name from his own family for the girl that Horst had adopted when he married her mother. Hans-Otto was an intelligence agent and his past is obscured except the name of his wife on his tombstone. Else Lotte is a Scandinavian name and Dorothea is used in Sweden and Norway.

 

2) Hitler's grandmother did not get pregnant from the Rothchild for whom she worked, but from a guest from the English royals. This could have happened in Vienna where Rothschild's house was or at the hunting lodge in Langau that was recently sold to Prinzhorn. Dorothea is used in two branches of the English royal family.

 

Comparing early photos of an older Queen Victoria and her even earlier portraits (which may be less faithful) with the photo of Hitler's mother make this a possibility.

 

I have seen no other explanation for Angela Dorothea Kasner's middle name.

 

Knowing what we do about how the Illuminati bloodlines divide responsibilities, it seems quite reasonable to suggest that the Roths do not want to put their bloodline into ruling positions. Whereas the noble families quite clearly do want to rule and rely on the Roths to fund them. So the theory of Hitler being a Rothschild sounds rather nonsensical, but since the bloodline of Queen Victoria did rule Germany pre WWI it seems quite reasonable that they wanted to rule it post WWI as well and use it to take over Russia and Kazakhstan's oilfields. And when that failed, they would want to rule the 4th Reich that we call the EU.

 

And what powerful family within the Illuminati has interests in territory in the South Atlantic where Hitler and other Nazis fled to? Falkland Islands? Didn't two royals personally take part in combat there?

Anonymous ID: 074c75 March 19, 2018, 12:31 a.m. No.718941   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8969 >>8985 >>8986

>>718787

 

What if the reason is that somebody orchestrates Israel, formerly British Palestine, from the shadows just like the CIA was orchestrating North Korea?

 

And we need to deal with that somebody first.

 

Now who might be really running this former British territory that was populated by Jews fleeing from Hitler's Germany? Well, do we really know who was behind Hitler? I mean, not just certain names like Henry Ford but in the great game of the Illuminati, which bloodline was pulling the strings of Hitler? The same bloodline probably runs Israel and strings need to be cut.

 

Some bloodlines in the Illuminati seem to play support roles. Taking them out of the game weakens the Illuminati, but may not be enough to pry loose control of Israel. We need to find evidence that clearly links one bloodline to control of Israel, of Hitler's Germany and of whatever place is their power base.

 

I have suspicions that I know, but that jus makes me a goddam shill slider like all the rest of the nutcases. We need evidence, facts, connections. And since I think I an getting into the heart of the spiders web where the queen bee has her nest, I need help. Everybody has been blaming Roths for being on top, but now I think they are the web itself. They control the money which greases the wheels of the machine but they are not the cap of the pyramid.

Anonymous ID: 074c75 March 19, 2018, 12:33 a.m. No.718972   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>718881

 

And the earth is flat. I know. I believe everything I read on this board especially when there is no evidence.

 

Why do people think this is a discussion board?

 

Are you all too lazy to dig, make connections, draw maps and share the evidence and facts that you have found?