>>7217530

86% of the crops in the San Joaquin Valley is corn? That doesn't sound right at all.

>>7217589

I understand that, you condescending asshole.

I'm telling you it still doesnt make sense.

>>7217589

And you obviously have a reading comprehension problem.

Reread my original post. Nowhere in there is the assumption that I thought 86% of corn production in the US was in his district.

Fucking idiot.

>>7217691

86% of the 1% is grown in the Valley.