>>7217285 LB
If you were trying to protect AOC's job, would you want a band of anons supporting her challenger? Epstein validated us; we're not a conspiracy, by their definition, any more.
>>7217285 LB
If you were trying to protect AOC's job, would you want a band of anons supporting her challenger? Epstein validated us; we're not a conspiracy, by their definition, any more.
..one day an anon begged Q to please rescue Dev from hostage at the Tractor Supply (turns out he does all his pressers there, or some place like it)