>>7228621 Pearson Education has multiple listings in USAspending.gov. The totals shown in the cap are just trailing 12 months. For the real picture each one will need to be investigated for All FY totals. What this doesn't show is what the totals were from 2004-2008.

Pearson PLC and 'child' recipients.

https://www.usaspending.gov/#/recipient/eae7e3fe-eb22-ce66-126c-46373ab37c67-P

>>7228741 So I threw the Pearson PLC DUNS number into advanced search on USAspending.gov, using it as the search term. Clicked on the third contract which was let to Pearson Government Solutions, Inc. (w/ DUNS #076325252). Pearson PLC is the 'parent' company, and the contract period was 2004-2011 for $67M dollars, awarded and paid for by the Department of Labor. I think there is much to be discovered about Pearson.

https://www.usaspending.gov/#/search/9254210fa7d39912fff7328561ea4f4e

>>7228938, >>7228981 So a contractor w/huge gov. contracts, which is a 'child' recipient of Pearson PLC, then publishes the works of government employees who were around when the contracts were let? Not stinking at all.