>>7237705

>ID+ is not very smart, this also filters anons replying to the shills.

I always ID+. I don't want to wast time on the anons who replied to said shills. There is very rarely anything of value in those replies.

>>7237885

>>7237904

No, that's not how it works. ID+ does not propagate beyond direct replies to an ID that you filter. It doesn't cause anyone who responds to that ID to become hidden in unrelated posts.

>>7238064

You haven't experimented wit it.

ID 'A' and three responses:

A1 → B1, C1, D1

Other chatter:

B2→C2, D2→B3, B4→E1, etc

ID+ing A via the A1 posts also hides B1, C1, and D1. But it does not also hide the B2, C2, D2, B3, B4, and E1 posts.

>>7238194

And well oxygenated blood that is outside the body for a few minutes will start to turn that darker red. Compare photos from immediately after with photos from 10-20 minutes later. If there is a change then it's real blood.