>>724137

I’m going to assume this is a real question.

>crap

You answered your own question.

Anyone who didn’t know Facebook was collecting personal data and selling it is a retard. Literally.

Trump campaign used data, just like everyone else, because it was for sale.

Obama camp was first to employ SM data.

But

It may have beneficial effect to blame it on trump…for IBOR.

Make libs rush to demand protection.

>>724193

>Be Martha Stewart, net worth $2b.

>Save $45k on stock trade.

>Go to prison.

Shit happens.

>>724215

Some also have typos…

>>724255

Because they are trying to make Trump look bad.

>>724271

Facebook data is for sale.

Period.

Not a trump thing, it’s a Facebook thing.

It’s a business thing.

It’s fucked up, but it’s a known thing.

>>724315

That’s my point.

It’s collected, it’s for sale.

media Is making it about trump.

It’s not about him.

It should be about them, about fairness

ABOUT IBOR

>>724367

We SHOULD be using that to get libs to DEMAND protection.

I am not a memer however.

>>724443

>>724459

The problem comes in that whoever put up IBOR petition specifically said “conservative voices”.

Liberals will not sign that.

That is why it has gotten no traction.

It is not appealing.

>>724489

>>724489

>>724489

>>724489

>>724489

I have said it before but saying again.

CURRENT IBOR PETITION CALLS FOR FAIRNESS FOR CONSERVATIVES.

MUST BE UNIVERSAL, NOT REFERENCE SIDES TO BE APPEALING.

>>724761

Well, she’s 78 next week so…

>>724790

>Yeah…but I really neeeeded to know what my Disney princess name was…

>It was fun, so I just gave them permission to look at my whole life.

>Then I spammed all my friends with the results.

>They didn’t take advantage of me did they?

My mom on FB.

>>724825

Yeah, cuz they aren’t faggots at all.