between the bittersweet and the belladonna?
and you have nothing.
if you were real you would link us back to the post that you say you 'noticed'.
you should never post things like this because it does not help the board, but helping isn't probably what you want to do here. you can partially redeem yuorself by posting a link to the questionable post from the other day that your reference. Also your response to this will tell us more about you.
anon, so I respond to the first shill, but that id is for another purpose to tell us to go do a snipe hunt in old breads with no link.
and as soon as I do that another anon posts the obvious, the one who I am responding to now, and deflects to a different topic all the way.
the first was specific about a particular poster. the second was obviously a deflector, and accusor. Doesn't want to spoil the set up of the first, who I have called out as being either (1) lazy. or (2) a shill or (3) I was just being an asshole.
so these two are a team, and maybe the same person. or AI.
They probably built them with a computer programme similarge to blender or other advanced render and composite imaging systems. They may have, in fact, had these tools a full generatin before it became ubiquitous elsewhere.
the tactic of 'make up something fake and insist it is real' is a common one. It's used to generate views in a live stream. It's often a ploy of 'entertainment television'. It's one of the keystone methodologies of shills. It was the cornerstone of the Obama administrations policy justifications.
you could also note my witty self-deprication, which shows me to not be an asshole. by the way you only get to choose one of those choices, not all three.
wait, let me get my high powered super vacuum cleaner 'anon's balls' attachment.
It has a very long handle, it's a robo suck. I don't need to be there for this to happen.
just kidding I don't have a remote robotic vaccuum powered shill'sballs sucking robo-sucker robotic drone with extensions and umbilicals and remote parts that deploy and suck the balls of shills.
shills, joylessly in the new day, fail constantly.
PS: you were supposed to link us back to the bread where you saw that stuff you claimed to have seen in the breads.
you need more coffee.
can you give us that link? so anon don't have to go hunting for it?
look up Dry Falls in Washington State and then realize that floods are a thing through out time, always happen, always will happen. And sometimes the situation is such that they are periodic.
nothing mystical about floods.
shills will imply things but if you call them out on it they will act all 'how dare you.'
if you want to dive into Epistomology and waste your time in speculation then, do go on.
Otherwise I suggest you study a philosopher or two.
I would start with Ludwig Wittgenstien a book called 'Philosophical Investigations'.
It's a book best read by reading what other pepole say about it first, then trying to read it. It's not really an easy book. But it is useful to give one knowledge into some of the questions that you make, and other such questions.
Ludwig discusses 'language games'
It's not an easy read. The book wasn't written so much as 'gathered' in bits and presented as a unified text. It's dense. But Wittgenstein does provide a good way to study esoteric issues about meaning and use of language.
sometimes when you ask esoteric questions maybe just answer them by yourself and spare the rest of us.
delving into the archives?
stlll providing no real information, still just dividing.
I've actually been to Red Bank.
I make a pilgrimage to the Quicky Mart so . . . not everyone.
>(You)
not sure what is up with you?
I'm giving you the gold standard of Philosophy, and a tool for sharpening your mind.
you're giving us streams of questions that a stoned freshman would recite at midnight while getting high with his college roommates.
sure looks fake to me.
no one would produce documents like this admitting to a conspiracy to riot.
Thank you for your Testimonial!
Spiritualists can be freed from the mistakes of occultism!
the form of the other anon's post is 'shill inciter and miss-informer'.
when there was a person who killed 7 people in New Hampshire the shills kept saying he was Russian when we was Ukranian. And they suppress the news of it from notables all that day.
Wittgenstein teaches us how to parse through the language games that other people play so that you can quick discet nonesense and overcome misscommunications.
I'm not asking you to believe anything.
I'm pointing out that for an up-and-coming seeker-after-truth who gets caught up in esoteric questioning, you can learn ways to parse through it quicker so that you can deflect the bunk and get to the part that is worth it.
sharing material isn't telling you you 'must' go and review it.
I think you're being too touchy.
no matter what I'd written you'd probably get angry at me.
that's cool.
me too.
if someone is too persistent I grow skeptical of them too.
an important thing to recognize is how to tell the difference between who wants to help and who is just there to cause problems.
I read once that a mystic is usually a solitary person.