Anonymous ID: e4aeb4 July 29, 2019, 5:17 a.m. No.7240797   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0811

>>7240728

 

Oh hey you’re back. Got bored a few weeks ago when I first saw you and did some light research on this. Very interesting I suppose. I’ve always loved this architectural style. It reminds me of the pyramids and how they exist all over the planet basically around the same time periods built in the same fashions. I didn’t really know what to make to this. My mind wandered off to the movie Anastasia, anyway. You were interesting shill. I started wondering why exactly this shill would be here pushing this. I think this is part of a longer shill script designed to break down a persons trust in history. Once you start going down the rabbit hole you’ll even question time and yourself and what you know. There was another shill here similar to you, but it said the architecture in places like this and Congress ect were actually designed as spaceships for the mind, I think he was here around thanksgiving of 2018. I’ve been here since 10/17.

 

Shills become hard to recognize at some point. The uniformity of your posting style is easily recognizable. It’s clear you’re a shill here. Are you here to inform or disinform? Your post count in single threads is troublesome. Maybe you’re just a bread filler shill so conversation about current events is muffled.

 

I guess now my main curiosity is who sent you here, but maybe not even that. I’m more curious what your end goal here is.

Anonymous ID: e4aeb4 July 29, 2019, 5:21 a.m. No.7240815   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0838

>>7240811

 

I’m not projecting. Did I misunderstand your subject matter? You do post a variety of things they happen to be the same thing. What am I protecting on to you? This is my third post in this thread, I’m clearly not a shill.

Anonymous ID: e4aeb4 July 29, 2019, 5:29 a.m. No.7240856   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>7240838

 

You are correct it does not add up. Neither do pyramids, sure I’ll just look at your information.

I acknowledge it doesn’t make sense. Yet how much of history can I really empirically analyze for myself? No matter what I would have to refer to an authority figure to claim you are wrong. I see the similarities, I find the line you’ve drawn interesting.

 

However your posting quality, style, uniformity and now your response also makes me think you’re a shill, I’ve been lurking daily for a long time and believe it or not I was specifically hoping you’d show up again because I did like the story you presented.

 

What is your end goal here, Mr. Shill?

Anonymous ID: e4aeb4 July 29, 2019, 5:33 a.m. No.7240880   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0905

>>7240855

 

I see. If your method is to disrupt realty and history you seek to disrupt what a person was taught at a basic level. This means that the point of this shill attack is to leave the target psychologically suspended from reality. What do you accomplish once you have a person in this position? Does your teammate shill show up to deliver the next round of blows? I’m assuming you’re a foreign shill for some reason just a feeling I get. Again, the information you’re presenting is great, interesting and it can be accepted logically. But I think your goal here is to disable or attack that part of the persons grasp of history. I guess if I want to see what your end goal is I’ll trigger your friend eventually.