Anonymous ID: 30a59b July 29, 2019, 9:14 a.m. No.7242887   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2908

how about the name fag who flipped.

and suddenly he was making up stuff about Donald.

and suddenly he's all 'I don't like I don't like.'

when before he liked him a little bit too much.

and was a little bit too into Q to the point of thinking that the Q message was just for him?

magical thinking on the part of that name fag?

and he goes on with 'I wouldn't have been on this . . . for 19 months' blah blah blah.

 

the flaw? not in Donald: we all know and love Donald and that is that.

but the flaw in the name fag seems to be an obcessive personality. He got too into being a cheer leader for both Q and Donald. Now he notices this as a flaw and attacks Donald for the famefags own flaw.

he is really mad at himself but because of pride he doesn't feel contrition or 'fear of the Lord' but instead blames the object of his obcession: Donald.

he hasn't gotten to blaming Q yet.

 

hey fame fag: my dad used to still care even when I'd tell him he was all wrong about politics.

you don't be a cheerleader for 19 months and then suddenly flip lik eyou did without some issue or another.

you still need to get over you obcessive personality.

and stop blaming the object of your obcession for the problem of your obcession, that you have this type of personality, that you are unable to let go of ideas that are proven wrong, as if some things can really be presented as factual, and not just a meta-concept.

 

there is no chance at all that Caroline and Diana are the same person. You are either just going with the lie becuase you have no capacity to quickly use logic and reasoning when it damages your ego, or you are intentionally larping this story for fame-points.

or some other reason.

as always support your effort to beocme a better man who understands politics and 'light and truth'

PS: Jesus rocks. Your education needs a stint of Sermon on the Mount study.

you should study, as well, again, Revelations.

I suggest Emmet Fox for a quick course in Christ.

Anonymous ID: 30a59b July 29, 2019, 9:23 a.m. No.7242984   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2993

the disorder of not being reflexive and being able to release your pride and admit that you were following delusive ideas might be due to a lot of different things.

It might be because the person was, himself, abused and his ego was fractured and he's got multiple peeps living in him.

I've seen how with me if someone really attractive seems interested in me I'm not really rational about it anymore. I might even be a bit of an ass kisser.

and so I noticed thi sin my self

years ago. I dealth with it. I realized the dynamic of it, what I was doing, how it was sabotaging my life.

 

and I fixed it.

 

the fame fag is still a young man. He's got time to work on it. but a belief in the 'surity of the magical' ought to be coupled with the idea of higher levels or 'realms'.

we might call it a nehter. I know some say 3D, 4D, 5D, but that is confusing with matamatics and coordinates.

 

basic point: magic is real in dreams but not in waking. the arguments you make in the 'meta magical' realms of 'allgorical' relationships must always be assumed as 'dream world' things.

 

so the idea of two pepole really being the same person? It's a dream world kind of an idea. In fact, shapeshifting is too.

yes, it's 'true' in the dream. But you can't say it in court. and asserting it as a narrative to explain politics and Q is a bit absurd.

Anonymous ID: 30a59b July 29, 2019, 9:30 a.m. No.7243044   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3077

the one who believes in the magic thinks of an explanation as 'fucking with him'?

no one is fucking with anyone. Someone notices a person who is stuck in a sort of psuedo-spiritual belief system, who is able to transfer over into a different realm and be there for a time, and come back and tell us about it.

OK, something many people do and write about.

but the different is that the world of dreams and the world of waking are not connected in a way where the things that are 'true' in a dream are necessarily true in the next dream, and not true when waking.

perhpas they stay true.

 

and if an anon is unable to understand when truth and light are shining through for him/her/? then, that anon lashes out but I never did post to any particular anon.

I'm praying for the famefag.

He's got a lot of issues.

puppying out is one of them

being dogmatic and bombastic an unable to let go of things he 'learned' through a method that, which not really 'bogus' is a dream or meta-realm method.

 

no one is fucking wiht anyone. I'm trying to give the anon insight, like a 'ghost of Christmas future'.

 

anon, if you are really the one, then you need to stop being angry at me and start being angry at yourself. I for one, wish you only good and success and that you would become even better than you are.

and all those demons you slay in your visions: those are representative of fallacies that you think are true but, in fact, are just playful narratives that others used to entertain you, and you missed their real meanings.

 

if you meet obsticles in your dreams those are YOUR obsticles.