Anonymous ID: 932443 July 29, 2019, 2:49 p.m. No.7248632   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>7248580

 

I don't see it that way, but those are valid points.

 

Pelosi and the Dems hold the purse strings and POTUS needed to rebuild the military, forcing a capitulation. When Ryan was around, he was a Never Trumper and the Senate was hanging by a thread. Beloved Leader has said cutting spending will be an agenda in his 2nd term, but we'll still need to retake the House. I'd stick the owners of the FED with the debt they've created and confiscate their assets and 0 all debt for all nations.

Anonymous ID: 932443 July 29, 2019, 2:57 p.m. No.7248753   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8776

>>7248588

 

>Is it possible he absolves all debt and defaults on the FED?

 

Fiat based currencies inherently collapse. Confiscate Central Bank assets and put the proceeds in the Treasury. The Donald has only had 4 bankruptcies, I thought? We need a 21st century banking system, not the post WWII out of date system we have now.

Anonymous ID: 932443 July 29, 2019, 3:27 p.m. No.7249150   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>7249096

 

>How much you wanna bet she met with Pelosi and the gang?

 

Monopoly money count?? Gotta keep the pipeline of new voters coming in and Nancy is looking for another 'campaign contribution.' Wait, the whole system has been disrupted and that wall isn't helping.