There is a wealth of evidence supporting the use of directed energy to destroy the World Trade Center complex.
Dr Judy Wood’s book provides the evidence.
Have you read her book?
The cover-up of 9/11 is well documented by Andrew Johnson in his book 9/11 Finding the Truth.
Have you read his book?
>>9300
Good point about liquid metal.
Agreed. The towers mostly tuned turned to dust in mid-air before they reached the ground.
Q !ITPb.qbhqo ID:wmN+33xv Wed 15 Nov 2017 02:25:29 No.149467690
Who financed 9-11?
Who was Bin Laden's handler?
Why was the Clowns in America tasked to hunt/kill/capture UBL?
Why not MI?
If we found UBL, eliminated his security, why would we immediately kill him and not take him alive?
Why wouldn’t we want to capture UBL alive and extract other possible T-level events?
My attempt at answers:
I don’t know.
The CIA was Bin Laden’s handler.
The CIA were given the task to hunt/kill/capture UBL so that it would lead nowhere and their patsy would be protected.
Military Intelligence should have been given the task to hunt/kill/capture UBL but were not because they would have uncovered the truth.
We wouldn’t. The report is fake.
We would. However, UBL played no part in the events of 9/11, as proved by the evidence.
The Evidence:
On 9/11, the towers mostly turned to dust in mid-air before they reached the ground.
http:// drjudywood .com
Dear Q,
Llitmus test.
"9/11 was a demonstration of a new technology; free energy." - Dr Judy Wood
“’Somebody’ has the ability to direct energy in such a way as to disrupt the molecular [and atomic] bonds of matter. That’s the most important thing in our lifetime, in history as we know it. ‘Someone can ‘de-molecularize’ the buildings. That’s pretty significant. This is a technology that’s used for evil purposes, but we can use it for good purposes too.” - Dr Judy Wood
Hurricane Erin track. Hurricane Erin was the closest to NYC on 9/11/01. Why?
A&E9/11 is the ‘second net’.
>>21155
Exactly. I hope the test is passed.
In order to secure a conviction one has to present evidence of what happened.
See the case of Casey Anthony.
>>22077
Well said.
>>23643
Well said.
No-one has disproved any of her evidence.
Good advice.
Some of what you state is true and I agree with, however:
Molten metal – implying high heat – was not found in the basement at the WTC.
The was no high heat reported at the WTC. It was reported that the dust cloud felt cooler than the ambient air.
Tritium is found in low energy nuclear reactions (LENR), aka cold fusion. “Tritium in low energy nuclear reactions (LENR) / cold fusion is evidence of a nuclear process without the ionising radiation.” - Dr Judy Wood
We don’t know who “did it”. And did what, exactly? In order to secure a conviction one has to provide evidence of WHAT happened. See the case of Casey Anthony.
Thermite is basically a cutting torch. I agree that thermite can’t explain the ‘toasted’ / destroyed cars. Directed energy does.
Building 7 was destroyed in a different way to the twin towers. It’s internal structure was turned to dust and the outer structure eventually fell (silently), but it wasn’t a collapse in the conventional sense. Towers 1 and 2 both experienced a faster than freefall destruction, from the top down. All seven buildings with a WTC prefix were destroyed on 9/11.
There were no remote control planes. Planes, real or fake, do not turn buildings into dust.
There is no evidence of a plane impact at either Shanksville or the Pentagon, as your images 3 and 5 show.
Disclosure, in relation to 9/11, means disclosing that free-energy technology exists. That is world changing. It is the biggest secret of 9/11. So far, it has been covered-up at all costs. Some people have paid the ultimate price.
As has been said, “nothing but a COLD DEW fits with the observed and recorded evidence”.
It has, but with so many people who claim to be aware of ‘the conspiracy’ yet are ignorant of this evidence, I thought I’d give it some more exposure in an attempt to raise their “plateau of understanding.”
Jim Fetzer, Steve Jones and Richard Gauge: Traitors.
“When I am king, you will be first against the wall.” - Radiohead