Blamo
>>23643
I think Dr. Judy Wood's hypothesis is correct (Hutchison effect/molecular dissociation/cold fusion/DEW) however, it looks like there was molten metal (see 4th image in >>63811)
, which I'm guess is attributable to thermite. Plus, it seems that traces of nanothermite were found in the rubble: http ://investigate911.org/
Thermite used to cut the support columns into sections, DEW to dustify 'em. Normies debate with truthers over jet fuel, and truthers debate over whether thermite or DEWs were used. That's my theory anyway.
You don't have to copy paste the same. The vid is pretty low quality too, but the concept being conveyed is understandable. Still think a combo of both were used. Nano-thermitic explosives severe the support columns, and heat up some metal to where it's literally molten and pouring out the side of the building on to the street below. See this >>10153.
DEW dustifies 'em shortly thereafter, leaving cookie cutter marks and further heating the material. Then have your friend Larry "pull it", and pull your Pentagon shenanigans (>>23013)
and you're good to go.
Not 9/11 related per se, but still relevant imo
How do you explain the free-fall speed and mid-air dustification of the towers then? My personal theory is that thermite charges severed the columns, and a DEW of some kind dustified the rest.