>>365344 swamp gas planet Venus weather balloon directed energy weapon
Tritium is hard to come by. You just can’t get it in any appreciable amount outside of special arrangements and facilities in my experience.
In any WTC building, I’m quite sure there would be no commercial or governmental enterprise with a legitimate need for any significant quantity of tritium. Aside from academic very small amounts of chemicals with regular H replaced with radioactive T and possibly some arcane medical need, I am not aware of any innocent source of tritium that could account for an elevated tritium signal there. But I shall dig for the arcane.
>>513215 so self uminescent exit signs use tritium…I wonder how many of these signs were contained in all WTC structures and if all of the signs were ground to dust, would that raise the ambient tritium level to what is indicated in that chart? Calculator time…
>>513423 50 Bq/L at WTC and I’m assuming that was a water sample. Assume rain, water in tower, firehose water went into water that was sampled….
>>513327 EXIT signs contain tritium. 10 to 20 Curies. 1 Curie = 37 gigabequerels GBq. So 1 EXIT sign contains 370 GBq of tritium assume. How many exit signs in WTC area got their glass tritium gas cylinders in the EXIT signs broken? I say probably all of them. So all that tritium from 1000+ EXIT signs is 370 TBq of tritium released in one spot. So I will say that finding only 50 Bq which is 50 disintegrations per second…from a source event that was in the terabecquerel range…I don’t see a need for cold fusion or DEW to make tritium UNLESS some anon has a way to show tritium exit signs were not used in WTC. More digging…
Tritium burns to make radioactive water, vapor which can condense or absorb into dust
>>517663 reading the paper cited it shows 35 Curies of tritium known on the planes, and more in gunsights and watches likely destroyed. The authors find these sources sufficient to account for the low but above background levels in the water sample…I think Judy is not buying that story but having to bring in cold fusion is a bridge too far imho. I'd focus on other anomalies of WTC
http:/ /drjudywood. com/pdf/tritium_15002340.pdf