Why not?
If your enemy is predictable and what matters is the outcome, then why would you not put their players in to do the very same things you need them to do?
If you try to buck the system, the system bucks you. That was something my father routinely reminded me of. He was of an older generation that was, perhaps, a little jaded after being beat down by the cabal decades before I was part of the world - but it is a point worth being aware of. If the cabal believes they have lost control of you, then you will be destroyed rather aggressively and violently. They must always believe they are the ones who have the proverbial Trump Card up their sleeves. They must believe you are stupid and incompetent. They must believe that they are actually the ones in control in order for you to be able to have little resistance to your own plan.
How much do you want to bet they thought Q was their own, as well… Or that Q was originally a plan for an anti-Hillary insurgency in the event she was elected to be sprung upon those who are aware of her crimes?
A contingency is like a card on the table. Once it goes from someone's hand and into play, the cards others are holding can easily turn that card against the one who played it. The first thing the cabal should wonder about is the nature of their watchers. The owls are not what they seem. Much like the military is not a simple lap dog of their policies, the intelligence wings who may have been formed under the cabal are able to see a world many are not, and it would be naive to believe those people would cease being human to become automatons dedicated to the preservation of hegemony.
This was an insight I had in my youth, and I have long spoken to the watchers, and I am certain they have watched me grow my understanding and ideas - and made the intent to share those with them.
Who will the intelligence agencies choose to serve - the people who treat them as puppets - or the people who have stood relatively unashamed in one-sided nakedness and grown, from nothing, ideas far beyond the scope and scale of the false archons?
The legal plan is one thing - but Q was a new possibility not as easily foreseen 30 years ago. Q is far, far bigger than many currently realize. It is actually proper to say that Q knows what has been denied to us - and that Q can only imagine what "we" (humanity) will accomplish with it.
https://youtu.be/950wlUjnWxs
If there had to be a theme song for that concept.