>>7252404 pb

TLDR: Theory about using the timestamps and markers to create the clock.

As far as I can understand from Q's hints, the minutes timestamp in a Q post represents one of the Q topics like a bad guy. And when we calculate the delta between a Q post and Trump's tweet about the same topic, that gives us the number on the countdown timer for that topic.

Mapping this out in graphic form would give us the actual "clock" that Q has referred to. The deltas would be the "markers" for the order of the posts in the graphic.

Q points out how to compare the minutes to get the marker/delta. We understand that easily enough.

>Timestamp [Q] post [:03] against POTUS' Tweet [:13]. [10]

And in posts 453, 454, and 455 he explains we would need to make a graphic of all the Q posts with the same minute timestamp (e.g. xx:22:xx). Then match each of those Q posts up to Trump's corresponding tweets on the same days and display them side-by-side. Calculate the delta for each pair, then order the pairs by those markers. Then read all Q posts about the bad guy that Q named as #2.

If the first digit in the minutes timestamp is for the topic, that means there would only be 6 primary topics related to the clock. So probably the 6 biggest criminals. Or maybe the top 6 by authority in the DOJ. Or if both digits in the Q post are for the topic, there could be 60 topics.

Still not completely clear to me, but this is the point I'm at for now.

>Timestamps important. Countdown? Markers. Timestamp & Content. This is to train you how to understand the correlation between posts and Tweets. Decipher. Think clock. Wind the clock w/ all markers.