dChan
Anonymous ID: 33827c July 30, 2019, 12:14 a.m. No.7255612   🗄️.is đź”—kun

In case you missed an anon's post late Monday–

 

Re: exculpatory evidence

Followed by multiple mentions of the Espionage Act

Further discussion re: Cheryl Mills & Heather Samuelson

 

https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-releases/judicial-watch-federal-court-orders-hearing-about-whether-to-speed-up-strzok-page-docs-release/

 

Clinton Lawyers Given Immunity from Espionage Act

The ACLJ uncovered it. The Obama Department of Justice (DOJ) and FBI granted Hillary Clinton’s attorneys immunity from the Espionage Act.

 

Today on Jay Sekulow Live, we discussed the latest information we obtained through our FOIA request that the Obama DOJ granted two of Hillary Clinton’s attorneys immunity from the Espionage Act, despite deliberate destruction of evidence.

 

Clinton’s top aides and lawyers Cheryl Mills and Heather Samuelson were given limited immunity by the FBI in exchange for turning over laptops – which they referred to as “culling laptops” – as part of an investigation. In fact, the FBI actually agreed to destroy the computers.

 

According to documents obtained through our FOIA request, they were given immunity from prosecution from anything found on their laptops, i.e. violations of multiple felony criminal statutes governing the mishandling of classified information and/or the removal or destruction of records, including provisions of the Espionage Act.

 

These weren’t just two lawyers representing Clinton. They were actively involved in what appears to be the cover-up. These laptops contained Hillary Clinton’s emails. And not only were her lawyers given immunity, but the FBI agreed to destroy the laptops and attempted to prevent the contents from being subject to the FOIA.

 

In addition, we seem to see the same individuals coming up time and time again in each of these sham investigations – Comey, Strzok, Page, and others – involved in both the Clinton investigation and the highly flawed investigation of President Trump.

 

Had these two Clinton aides been convicted of espionage charges, they could’ve served a combined sentence of 28 years in prison. But instead they are free and clear.

 

As Prof. Harry Hutchison stated on the show, it seems clear there was a deliberate and clear conspiracy to destroy evidence of any violation that could implicate Mills, Samuelson, or their boss, Hillary Clinton. It was a sham investigation by the FBI and DOJ.

 

This has been a 3 year process. Our Clinton/Lynch FOIAs started back in 2016, and have continued to expand over 3 years as more and more information comes to light.

 

You can listen to the full episode here:

https://aclj.org/government-corruption/radio-recap-uncovered-clinton-lawyers-given-immunity-from-espionage-act

Anonymous ID: 33827c July 30, 2019, 12:31 a.m. No.7255757   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>7255704

>What was she doing in Venice Italy?

Spending our money, putting the entire worthless group up at the 5-star Hotel Danieli and dining on gourmet meals.

While they were there, Pelosi probably met with her elite bosses and listened to what she's supposed to do next. Unknown if she met with Huma Abedin, who hangs out with Emma, the (wife/lover?) of El Chapo, who we have confirmed for a fact was in Venice at the same time as the Pelosi group.

Now they're in Ghana, where they'll go through the motions of shaking hands and posing for photos and having a lame conference where nothing worth a damn is uttered by anyone. The ladies will change clothes a lot and they'll have some more meals. They'll be wishing for more air conditioning (Ghana in July? Seriously?) and then they'll pack up and fly back here and talk about their "working trip".

Anonymous ID: 33827c July 30, 2019, 12:45 a.m. No.7255882   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>7255769

GAH, THANK YOU

If I've been thinking they were going to actual Ghana, probably some others have as well

 

Ghana probably had to put an embassy someplace interesting like Venice, because let's be honest, nobody really wants to go to Ghana.