Well it's true. High falutin' propaganda only targets a few. But what did his genius propaganda master say?
>There was no point in seeking to convert the intellectuals. For intellectuals would never be converted and would anyway always yield to the **er, and this will always be "the man in the street." Arguments must therefore be crude, clear and forcible, and appeal to emotions and instincts, not the intellect. Truth was unimportant and entirely subordinate to tactics and psychology.
Propaganda in general:
>Good propaganda does not need to lie, indeed it may not lie. It has no reason to fear the truth. It is a mistake to believe that people cannot take the truth. They can. It is only a matter of presenting the truth to people in a way that they will be able to understand. A propaganda that lies proves that it has a bad cause. It cannot be successful in the long run.
Also, to bring the lefties on board
>The essence of propaganda consists in winning people over to an idea so sincerely, so vitally, that in the end they succumb to it utterly and can never escape from it.
We have to win them over, without them ever noticing that their opinions, their ideals are being molded from the outside.
How do you think they became leftist in the first place?
Same technique.
DO WHAT WORKS, IGNORE & DISCARD WHAT DOES NOT