>https://twitter.com/MinorStrmMedia/status/1156328944951418881
Source: https://www.wakingtimes.com/2019/07/30/ny-fire-commissioners-call-for-new-9-11-investigation-citing-overwhelming-evidence-of-explosives/
>https://twitter.com/MinorStrmMedia/status/1156328944951418881
Source: https://www.wakingtimes.com/2019/07/30/ny-fire-commissioners-call-for-new-9-11-investigation-citing-overwhelming-evidence-of-explosives/
Judge dismisses DNC hacking lawsuit against Trump team, says claims 'entirely divorced from the facts'
A federal judge in frank terms Tuesday dismissed a lawsuit by the Democratic National Committee (DNC) against key members of the Trump campaign and WikiLeaks over hacked DNC documents, saying they "did not participate in any wrongdoing in obtaining the materials in the first place" and therefore bore no legal liability for disseminating the information.
The ruling came as Democrats increasingly have sought to tie the Trump team to illegal activity in Russia, in spite of former Special Counsel Robert Mueller's findings that the campaign in fact refused multiple offers by Russians to involve them in hacking and disinformation efforts.
The DNC asserted in court filings that the Trump team's meetings "with persons connected to the Russian government during the time that the Russian GRU agents were stealing the DNC's information" were "circumstantial evidence" that they were conspiring with the Russians to "steal and disseminate the DNC's materials."
Thet suit did not allege that the stolen materials were false or defamatory but rather sought to hold the Trump team and other defendants liable for the theft of the DNC's information under various Virginia and federal statutes, including laws protecting trade secrets.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/dnc-lawsuit-trump-campaign-russia-wikileaks-hacking-dismissed
Exculpatory evidence?
>>7246642
>https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/exculpatory
>Q