No. That case was a civil suit with the DNC suing Trump, using fumes for evidence. The case was thrown out without any need to undertake discovery. Even if the DNC had all the proof they claimed, they had no claim.
Can't sue the Russian government in civil court. See FSIA (not the same as FISA, but easily confused for obvious reasons).
Can't sue Trump for using and encouraging the stolen e-mails, 1st amendment works for him too.
People are going to be disappointed, The range of CRIMINAL leaks is minute - tiny - minuscule. It is also not a CRIME to frame a candidate or the president with a false accusation. Tort of defamation, maybe.
Law is a tool. Like any tool it can be used for evil, and that is exactly what the government does with the law.
The contents of the memos that Comey obviously intended to make public are not the sort of contents that support a criminal leak charge. Criminal leaks are approximately military intelligence, spy intelligence, and cryptography related.
While actionable as a tort of defamation, it is also not a CRIME to lie about anybody, unless you lie TO the authorities in a material fashion. The authorities can lie with impunity, and they do.
That's why the government is so protective about what it actually does. It is a crime to tell the public how much snooping the government does without a warrant and without any cause except "curiosity," paranoia, and the need to feel in control of the public.
The government is not "of us," is is "us and them." They make the rules, they enforce the rules selectively so as to avoid accountability, and they are quite willing to use all the force necessary to keep the people in line.