>always was, and always will be.
Yet there's not a single shred of evidnece he "always was."
Uh huh. I wonder what kind of dissonance it takes to keep
such thoughts while trying to figure this simple truth out.
>always was, and always will be.
Yet there's not a single shred of evidnece he "always was."
Uh huh. I wonder what kind of dissonance it takes to keep
such thoughts while trying to figure this simple truth out.