>>7303040

I think it's very telling that the fake MSM writes about Q Anon but never shows any of the Q posts with some of the most salacious observations and breab crumbs we been shown.

Why might that be? Because they're afraid too!

There'll come a day soon when the QQQuestion gets asked but it seems like a list (if possible!) of the top 10 most riveting Q posts might come in handy.

It'll be difficult to narrow it down but if a top 10 example of Q posts starts circulating I'd bet the posts start showing up in MSM articles and start getting dissected.

We need a list.

>>7303276

We need to essentially dare the MSM to publish the posts and we also need to provide a brief and proper context and analysis of them because you know they'll twist and misconstrue it as much as possible.

Rolling Stone or Forbes seems like they'd be up to it.

>>7303362

>>7303456