>>7306490 lb

Shills and bots don't know how to think like an anon. They just can't. Any point they try to make is immediately perceived by anons as shilling so it's ineffective, other than sometimes being irritating or insulting. But that doesn't change minds, it makes anons fight harder. The best they can try to do is take phrases or ideas real anons have posted, and bend those to try to mean the opposite. They hope we will think is an actual anon saying it, and consider the message instead of filtering immediately.

>>7306593

Thanks for the share

>>7306593

>we were interested in the methods most effective in getting information into a subject's brain - no matter how wrong

He mentions autism in there. Wonder if he's saying something like this:

The human mind has been intentionally "evolved" over thousands of years to directly consume information without any filters, to be better sheep for those in power. A percentage of the population does not respond to the evolutionary programming. Those humans who process information before internalizing it, due to having less emotional response (like autism), have been mostly wiped out over time because society saw them as outcasts, they reproduced less, and were targeted by the powerful.